Class 10 History Chapter 1- The Rise of Nationalism in Europe (Question Answers)

 

Class 10 History

Chapter 1- The Rise of Nationalism in Europe

(Question Answers)

 

·          

·          

 

Question 1(a)
Write a note on Guiseppe Mazzini.
Answer:

1. Giuseppe Mazzini (1807-1872) was an Italian statesman, journalist, and advocate deeply committed to the unification of Italy, playing a pivotal role in spearheading the Italian revolutionary movement. His tireless endeavors contributed significantly to the realization of an independent and unified Italy, replacing numerous fragmented states, many of which were under foreign dominance.
2. Furthermore, Mazzini played a crucial role in shaping the contours of the modern European movement advocating for popular democracy within a republican framework.
3. Mazzini held fervent republican ideals and envisioned a cohesive, liberated, and autonomous Italy, driven by the principles of republicanism.
4. In contrast to his contemporary Garibaldi, who shared similar republican sentiments, Mazzini steadfastly adhered to his republican principles, refusing to pledge allegiance to the House of Savoy.
5. Mazzini emerged as a spiritual force behind the resurgence of Italy, actively participating in the Carbonari, a revolutionary organization. His arrest in 1830 and subsequent exile in 1831 for attempting a revolution in Liguria did not deter him. Instead, he founded two clandestine societies: Young Italy in Marseilles and Young Europe in Berne, attracting like-minded young men from Poland, France, Italy, and the German states.
6. Mazzini's belief in the natural unity of nations led him to advocate for the consolidation of Italy into a single, unified republic within a broader alliance of nations. He championed republicanism as the embodiment of popular sovereignty, vehemently opposing monarchy, a stance that unsettled conservatives, with Metternich labeling him as 'the most dangerous enemy of our social order.'
7. Despite facing setbacks, including unsuccessful insurrections by Young Italy, Mazzini's legacy endures as one of the principal architects of Italy. While he may have lacked certain qualities of practical leadership and underestimated the strength of opposition, Mazzini's unwavering dedication fueled the growth of patriotism for a country that existed primarily in the realm of imagination.

Question 1(b)
Write a note on Count Camillo de Cavour.
Answer:

Cavour, known for his realistic approach to politics, strategically allied with France and, when necessary, with its key adversary, Prussia.

Utilizing the dynamics of international power, Cavour effectively pursued his domestic goals with a focus on the liberation of northern Italy from Austrian domination. As a brilliant and unwavering diplomat, he emerged as a central figure in the unification of Italy.

Distrustful of reactionary politics prevalent in Europe, particularly evident in Austria's repressive rule over a significant portion of Italy, Cavour was driven by a desire to break free from such constraints.

Assuming the role of Prime Minister of Piedmont in 1852, Cavour implemented comprehensive reforms, including the reorganization of the army, leading to rapid material prosperity. Through a diplomatic alliance with France, Sardinia-Piedmont successfully defeated Austrian forces in 1859.

In addition to regular troops, a substantial number of armed volunteers, under the leadership of Giuseppe Garibaldi, joined the struggle. Their collective efforts in 1860 led to the liberation of South Italy and the Kingdom of Two Sicilies, driving out the Spanish rulers. Despite Cavour's instrumental role in the unification of Italy under King Victor Emmanuel II, he passed away on June 6, 1861, before witnessing the completion of Italy's unification in 1870. Although not a revolutionary or democrat, Cavour's contributions were pivotal in the historical unification process.

Question 1(c)
Write a note on The Greek war of independence.
Answer:

1. The Greek War of Independence, also referred to as the Greek Revolution, marked a triumphant struggle waged by Greek revolutionaries between 1821 and 1832 against the Ottoman Empire. During this conflict, the Greeks received support from various European powers such as the Russian Empire, Great Britain, and France, while the Ottomans garnered assistance from their vassals in regions like Egypt and Algeria.
2. The historical context of Greece being part of the Ottoman Empire since the 15th century set the stage for the eruption of revolutionary nationalism in Europe, igniting the Greek struggle for independence in 1821.
3. The primary objective of the Greek revolutionaries was to expel the Turks from Europe and re-establish the ancient Greek eastern empire.
4. Nationalists within Greece found support not only from compatriots living in exile but also from numerous Western European countries sympathetic to their cause.
5. Poets and artists celebrated Greece as the cradle of European civilization, leveraging their influence to rally public opinion in support of its struggle against Ottoman rule. Notably, the English poet Lord Byron played a significant role by organizing funds and eventually participating in the war effort.
6. The culmination of the Greek War of Independence came with the signing of the Treaty of Constantinople in 1832, which formally recognized Greece as an independent nation. This newfound independence was guaranteed by influential European powers such as Russia, England, and France, solidifying Greece's status as a sovereign state.

Question 1(d)
Write a note on Frankfurt parliament.
Answer:

1. The Frankfurt Parliament, convened from 1848 to 1849, emerged amidst the fervor of the liberal revolution that swept across the German states in early 1848, symbolizing a pivotal moment in German political history.
2. This historic assembly was summoned by a preliminary gathering of German liberals in March 1848 and comprised members elected through direct manhood suffrage, representing a diverse array of political ideologies and including prominent figures from across Germany.
3. With the overarching goal of planning the unification of Germany, the Frankfurt Parliament embarked on a monumental task aimed at forging a cohesive national identity amidst the traditionally separate German states.
4. However, the formidable challenge of navigating the complex dynamics among these states, particularly the longstanding rivalry between Austria and Prussia, posed significant obstacles to the progress of the parliament's unification efforts.
5. Despite deliberations and debates, the culmination of the Frankfurt Parliament's endeavors came in March 1849 with the adoption of a federal constitution for the German states, excluding Austria. This constitution envisioned a parliamentary government and the establishment of a hereditary emperor, with Frederick William IV of Prussia initially selected for this role.
6. Regrettably, Frederick William IV's refusal to accept the crown from a popularly elected assembly dealt a fatal blow to the aspirations of the Frankfurt Parliament. Faced with this setback, a majority of the representatives withdrew, and the remaining members were ultimately dispersed. Consequently, the parliament's ambitious agenda remained unfulfilled as the intervention of troops forced the assembly to disband, leaving its objectives unrealized.

Question 2: How did the French revolutionaries endeavor to instill a sense of shared identity among the French populace?

Answer: Right from the outset, the French revolutionaries implemented diverse strategies and initiatives aimed at fostering a collective identity among the French people. Concepts like la patrie (the fatherland) and le citoyen (the citizen) were introduced to underscore the idea of a cohesive community enjoying equal rights under a constitution. They replaced the former royal standard with the tricolour, a new French flag. The Estates General, elected by active citizens, was renamed the National Assembly. Furthermore, they composed new patriotic hymns, administered oaths, and commemorated martyrs in the name of the nation. A centralized administrative system was established to formulate uniform laws for all citizens within the territory, abolishing internal customs duties and dues, and adopting a standardized system of weights and measures. Regional dialects were discouraged, with French, as spoken and written in Paris, becoming the nation's common language.

Question 3: Who were Marianne and Germania, and why was their portrayal significant?

Answer: In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, artists anthropomorphized nations, representing them as female figures to provide a tangible form to the abstract notion of the nation. Marianne, chosen to embody France, didn't symbolize any specific woman but rather stood for the collective idea of a people's nation. She was depicted with characteristics symbolizing liberty and the Republic, such as the red cap, tricolour, and cockade. Statues of Marianne adorned public squares, reinforcing national symbols of unity and encouraging identification with them. Similarly, Germania represented the German nation, often depicted wearing a crown of oak leaves symbolizing heroism. Their portrayal was significant in reminding the public of the national symbols of unity and persuading them to identify with these allegorical figures.

Question 4: Outline the process of German unification briefly.

Answer: Nationalist sentiments surged among middle-class Germans in 1848, prompting efforts to unify the disparate regions of the German confederation into a nation-state governed by an elected parliament. Despite these liberal aspirations, the movement for nation-building was quashed by the monarchy, military, and Prussian landowners known as Junkers. Prussia subsequently assumed leadership in the quest for national unification, spearheaded by Otto von Bismarck, its chief minister. Through three wars over seven years, including conflicts with Austria, Denmark, and France, Prussia emerged victorious, culminating in the proclamation of William I as German Emperor in January 1871 at Versailles.

Question 5: What reforms did Napoleon implement to enhance administrative efficiency in the territories under his rule?

Answer: Napoleon introduced several administrative changes to enhance efficiency in his governed territories. Firstly, he promulgated the Civil Code of 1804, known as the Napoleonic Code, which abolished privileges based on birth, established equality before the law, and safeguarded property rights. He also simplified administrative divisions in various regions like the Dutch Republic, Switzerland, Italy, and Germany. Napoleon abolished the feudal system, freeing peasants from serfdom and manorial dues, and eliminated guild restrictions in towns. Moreover, he implemented improvements in transport and communication systems and introduced uniform laws, standardized weights and measures, and a common national currency. Despite his return to monarchy, Napoleon incorporated revolutionary principles into the administrative system to render it more rational and efficient.

 

Question 6: Define the 1848 liberal revolution and outline the political, social, and economic ideologies espoused by the liberals.

Answer:  The 1848 liberal revolution, following in the footsteps of the French Revolution, championed the abolition of autocracy and clerical privileges, advocating instead for constitutionalism and representative government through parliament. Nineteenth-century liberals also emphasized the sanctity of private property. While inspired by the French Revolution, liberal-nationalists in 1848 Europe, amidst widespread popular unrest, sought to combine demands for constitutionalism with aspirations for national unification. This movement, led by the educated middle class, demanded the establishment of nation-states based on parliamentary principles, including constitutional frameworks, freedom of the press, and freedom of association.

Question 7: How did the evolution of nationalism in Britain differ from that in the rest of Europe?

Answer:  Unlike the sudden upheavals seen in much of Europe, nationalism in Britain evolved gradually over time. Prior to the eighteenth century, there was no unified British nation, with primary identities revolving around ethnic distinctions like English, Welsh, Scottish, or Irish, each with its own cultural and political traditions. However, as England's wealth and power grew, it gradually exerted influence over the other nations of the British Isles. The English parliament, seizing power from the monarchy in 1688, played a pivotal role in forging a nation-state with England at its core. The Act of Union in 1707 further solidified this process, creating the United Kingdom of Great Britain, with England's dominance shaping the identity of the broader British nation and suppressing the distinctive cultures and institutions of Scotland and other regions.

Question 8: What were the underlying reasons for nationalist tensions in the Balkans?

Answer:  The Balkans emerged as a hotspot of nationalist tension in post-1871 Europe due to its geographical and ethnic diversity, comprising a mix of modern-day Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Greece, Macedonia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Serbia, and Montenegro, with inhabitants broadly identified as Slavs. Much of the Balkans was under Ottoman control, and the spread of romantic nationalism in the region coincided with the Ottoman Empire's decline, creating a volatile situation. Despite Ottoman attempts at modernization and internal reforms, various Balkan nationalities sought independence or political rights, rooted in claims of historical independence usurped by foreign powers. These nationalities viewed their struggles as efforts to reclaim lost independence, contributing to ongoing nationalist tensions in the Balkans.