Showing posts with label Questionanswers(12 class). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Questionanswers(12 class). Show all posts

Class 12 English Vistas Chapter 1 – The Third Level Long question answers

 NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Vistas

Chapter 1 – The Third Level

Long question answers

Question 1)  Do you see an intersection of time and space in the story?

Answer. Certainly! Throughout the story, various instances showcase the convergence of time and space. It all begins with the third level, a place that doesn't exist in the current era, yet Charley strongly feels he's present in the third level of Grand Central Station. The vivid descriptions of the station, the ticket counters, the currency, the lighting, the people's attire, facial hair styles, and the newspaper dated 1894 all serve as manifestations of the intersection between time and space. These elements belong to the 1880s and 1890s, while Charley resides in the present, highlighting the clear intersection of time and space.

When Charley attempts to purchase tickets for himself and Louisa on the third level, he encounters currency from an earlier period, further emphasizing the clash of temporal dimensions. Lastly, the letter from 1894, authored by Sam and addressed to Charley, represents yet another instance of the intersection of time and space. Both individuals exist in the present, but the letter itself belongs to the historical time frame of 1894, showcasing this fascinating convergence of temporal realities.

Question 2)   Philately helps keep the past alive. Discuss other ways in which this is done. What do you think of the human tendency to constantly move between the past, the present and the future?

Answer. Philately serves as a means to preserve elements that have vanished from existence, such as letters, currencies, manuscripts, and ancient utensils. Safeguarding and archiving these artifacts in museums contributes to keeping the past vibrant and ensuring the transfer of knowledge to future generations. This practice enables us to glean insights into past actions, our current position, and potential future endeavors. I find it remarkable how human nature seamlessly navigates between the past, present, and future, fostering connections across different temporal realms. There's a profound yearning to understand our origins while aspiring for progress in the future. Exploring our historical background has led to discoveries concerning ancient monuments, ideologies, practices, and lifestyles, enlightening us about our evolutionary journey.

This innate curiosity about both our past and future serves multiple purposes. It aids in averting potential disasters or mitigating their impacts, as exemplified by practices like weather forecasting. This fascination with the past and future offers valuable insights that enable us to prevent calamities or minimize their consequences.

Question 3)  Would Charley ever go back to the ticket-counter on the third level to buy tickets to Galesburg for himself and his wife?

Answer After perusing the story, we discover Charley's keen interest in journeying to Galesburg alongside his wife, Louisa. Despite his initial encounter with the third level, Charley couldn't retrace his steps to find it again. Initially stumbling upon the third level by chance, when he eventually reached the ticket counter, he realized his currency was incompatible, belonging to a different era. In an attempt to secure two tickets to Galesburg, he returned to Grand Central Station after converting his three hundred dollars into the requisite "old-style currency." However, upon his return, the corridor leading to the third level eluded him. Hindered by his wife's mounting concern for his safety, Charley ceased actively searching for the elusive third level after a while.

Question 4)  Apparent illogicality sometimes turns out to be a futuristic projection? Discuss.

Answer The apparent lack of logic in certain ideas can sometimes reveal a visionary aspect. Consider the Wright Brothers' invention of the first airplane: before this, the notion of human flight seemed unimaginable. Similarly, prior to Alexander Graham Bell's invention of the telephone, the concept of real-time long-distance communication was deemed impossible. Furthermore, there exist instances of inventions, like the modern sewing machine with a needle possessing a hole on its seemingly incorrect end, that originated from dreams but are now integral parts of our daily reality.

All these instances highlight how seemingly illogical fantasies at one point can evolve into revolutionary advancements that shape humanity's future. Consequently, it's not implausible to contemplate the concept of railway stations equipped with time-machine devices, enabling travel from one era to another—a potential innovation that might redefine the very notion of time-bound transportation.

Question 5)  Philately helps keep the past alive. Discuss other ways in which this is done. What do you think of the human tendency to constantly move between the past, the present and the future?

Answer In addition to philately, there exist numerous avenues to preserve the essence of the past. Curating historical artifacts, paintings, and inscriptions within museums, collecting and perusing literature (including autobiographies, biographical sketches, letters, and diary entries) spanning different epochs, and engaging with documentaries and visual media are among the diverse methods to revisit history. Furthermore, upholding cultural rituals and traditions, recording memories through videos, photographs, and audio archives, and revitalizing ancient monuments, structures, and artifacts offer invaluable educational experiences for visitors while bolstering tourism.

The human ability to transition between past, present, and future is a profound intellectual asset. This inclination allows individuals to plan for the future by leveraging lessons from the past. For instance, consider the straightforward approach of a student preparing for board exams. Analyzing past performance (such as class tests or mid-year exams), the student devises a strategy to focus on weaker areas, aiming for improved future results. Consequently, this proclivity aids in acknowledging the consequences of pivotal decisions made at any juncture and facilitates learning from them.


Class 12 English Vistas Chapter 1 – The Third Level Short question answers

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Vistas

Chapter 1 – The Third Level

Short question answers

Question 1) What does the third level refer to?

 

Answer. The third level refers to an additional floor at Grand Central Station, which previously had only two floors. Charley was hallucinating one night on his way home when he reached the third level.

 

Question 2)  Would Charley ever go back to the ticket counter on the third level to buy tickets to Galesburg for himself and his wife?

 

Answer. Charley looked back for the third level that could transport him and his wife to Galesburg because he wanted to return to his history. He wished to return to a world that had not witnessed two of its deadliest conflicts, which changed everything.


Question 3) Do you think that the third level was a medium of escape for Charley? Why?

Answer. Yes, Charley used the Grand Central Station's third level as an escape route. The modern world has many problems, and in order to escape reality, one may resort to daydreaming or hallucinations. We are all aware of the hardships of the current world, which is full of concern and pressure; therefore, in order to lift the burden off his shoulders and breathe a sigh of relief, Charley resorted to abandoning reality, albeit accidentally.

 

Question 4)  What do you infer from Sam’s letter to Charley?

Answer. The manner Charley discovered Sam's letter was unusual. It was one of those first-day covers that people used to mail to themselves in the past, with a blank page inside. So, to begin, the cover contained a letter rather than a blank page. Second, the letter was written on July 18, 1894, when Sam (the writer) did not exist, as both Sam and Charley do now. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that it was simply a product of Charley's imagination.

Class 12 English Flamingo Going Places (A.R. Barton) Long question answers

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

Going Places  

(A.R. Barton)

Long question answers

 

Question 1) Why did Sophie like her brother Geoff more than any other person? From her perspective, what did he symbolise?

Answer: Geoff stands as the sole confidant for Sophie's fanciful aspirations and cherished dreams. Her father, exhibiting bossiness and aggression, despises Sophie's imaginative tales. Even her younger brother, Derek, teases her about her aspirations for wealth. Among her peers, Jansie is labeled as 'nosy' and deemed unreliable in keeping secrets. Only Geoff earns Sophie's trust to safeguard all her confidences.

In Sophie's eyes, Geoff represents an older brother who has ventured into unknown territories, fostering her desire that he might one day take her along. He exhibits empathy, cautioning her about Casey's potential involvement with numerous girls. Geoff forewarns her of the unlikelihood of Casey reappearing, delivering his message with gentleness to spare the young dreamer's heart.

Question 2) What socio-economic background did Sophie belong to? What are the indicators of her family’s financial status?

Answer: Sophie hails from a lower middle-class family, finding solace in escapism and harboring extravagant dreams beyond her means. Her aspirations extend beyond the realm of reality. When discussing boutiques, Jansie highlights the hefty financial requirement, a reality that Sophie acknowledges, knowing her family's financial constraints. She remarks, "If I ever came into money, I'd buy a boutique," a sentiment even little Derek comprehends as unrealistic.

Geoff's occupation mirrors their socio-economic status—he works as an apprentice mechanic, commuting daily to a distant part of the city. His ill-fitting jacket reflects their circumstances. Sophie's father lacks refinement, a heavy-breathing man who lounges in his undershirt at the table, emitting grunts while carelessly tossing one of Derek's shoes onto the sofa. Their living space is cramped, with a stove occupying the same room as a corner piled with soiled laundry. Sophie's father heads to the pub on his bicycle. These elements collectively reaffirm the family's lower middle-class background.

Question 3) It is natural for teenagers to have unrealistic dreams. What would you say are the benefits and disadvantages of such fantasising?

Answer: Adolescents brim with unbridled enthusiasm and ambitions, often enveloped in sweet reveries and ongoing fantasies—a natural inclination for their age group. Every young individual embodies a sense of dreaming. For every renowned scientist or writer, a dream once ignited their pursuit. Without something to aspire to, the path towards a goal remains elusive. Dreams serve as the gateway to the coveted realm of success.

Some teenagers immerse themselves in a realm of fantasy, harboring unrealizable aspirations akin to a child's desire for the unreachable moon. They stand rooted in reality yet gaze upon the stars, an act that can lead to disappointment and disenchantment. A dreamer who falls short of realizing their dream is often unfairly branded as a failure. Conversely, those who manifest their dreams ascend as heroes and achievers within their respective domains.

In my view, it's preferable to foster dreams, even if their fulfillment remains elusive. Without the dreams of teenagers, would those adorned with gray hair and beards still harbor aspirations? Allowing adolescents to indulge in their inherent activity of dreaming about a luminous future encourages them to strive toward translating those dreams into tangible realities.


Question 4)  Write the characterskech of Sophie.

Answer: Sophie, a young schoolgirl, envisions grand and extravagant aspirations, some of which exceed her grasp or financial means. Her ambitions seem disconnected from life's harsh realities as she dreams of owning a boutique—the most spectacular shop in the city. Alternately, she entertains thoughts of becoming an actress, recognizing the potential financial gains in that field. In her mind, managing the boutique could be a side endeavor while pursuing acting, and if need be, she contemplates a career as a fashion designer. However, she remains oblivious to her family's limited financial resources, rendering her dreams unattainable.

Her heart captivated by Danny Casey, a young Irish footballer and the hero of her fantasies, Sophie delves into idolization. She recounts an encounter with Casey, dismissed by her father as another of her "wild stories," a tale even Geoff, her brother, finds dubious. Geoff attempts to caution her about Casey's celebrity status, warning her of the many admirers vying for his attention, yet Sophie remains steadfast in her belief.

Sophie, an incorrigible dreamer, fixates on Casey despite having seen him only once. She spends her time lost in thoughts of him, waiting alone for his appearance. However, her sadness and despondency set in when Casey fails to materialize. Her suffering stems from the disparity between her dreams and the ensuing disappointments, all products of her imaginative mind.

Question 5)  Compare and contrast Sophie and Jansie highlighting their temperament and aspirations.

Answer: Sophie and Jansie, classmates and companions, hail from lower middle-class backgrounds and are both destined for the biscuit factory. Jansie embodies practicality and grounded thinking, firmly rooted in reality. In contrast, Sophie remains oblivious to life's harsh truths, enraptured by grand aspirations. Her desires for a boutique and an actress's glamorous life, drawn by the allure of wealth, extend far beyond her current means. She even entertains the notion of being a fashion designer, craving sophistication and grandeur, though these dreams reside well beyond her grasp. Despite Jansie's sensible advice, Sophie persists as a romantic dreamer.

Their disparities in thought and temperament are pronounced. Sophie dwells in a realm of dreams, entrusting her secrets solely to her elder brother Geoff. In contrast, Jansie's inquisitiveness can make her a bit nosy, keen on uncovering new information about others. This propensity to spread stories discourages Sophie from confiding in her.

Sophie, an unyielding dreamer and escapist, idolizes the young Irish footballer, Danny Casey. Her infatuation with him renders her sorrowful and powerless, yet it doesn't prompt her to gain wisdom or practicality. She remains steadfast in her dreamy disposition. In contrast, Jansie embodies practicality and realism, devoid of such unrealistic dreams.

Question 6) Who was Danny Casey ? How was he adored by the family of Sophie, and specially by Sophie and her father?

Answer: Danny Casey, an Irish football prodigy, emerged as a marvel in the realm of soccer, captivating the hearts of his numerous admirers. As a player for United, he became the focal point of obsession for Sophie's family. Sophie's father likened the young Casey to the renowned footballer Tom Finney, aspiring for Casey to reach similar heights. Aware of the prevalent distractions for young players in the sport, he hoped Casey would remain grounded. Geoff, expressing high regard, considered Casey to be among the country's best players, hoping he'd surpass even the esteemed Tom Finney. However, Sophie's father deemed Casey too young for the first team, despite his exceptional talent already securing him a spot in the starting lineup.

During their customary Saturday stadium visit to witness United's match, Sophie's family eagerly observed their idol, Danny Casey, in action. He skillfully maneuvered around defenders, reaching the penalty area and ultimately scoring the second goal, securing United's 2-0 victory. Sophie beamed with pride, Geoff was elated, and amidst the excitement, aspirations ran high, with one family member even expressing hopes for Ireland's World Cup victory. To celebrate, Sophie's father headed to the pub.

Sophie harbored a deep admiration for Danny Casey, nurturing a romantic infatuation for the Irish prodigy. Her heart swelled with affection for her hero, often envisioning scenarios where Casey would approach her. Sitting beneath an elm tree, she would wait and dream, only to face the harsh reality that he wouldn't come. This experience left her crestfallen, becoming a casualty of her own dreams and subsequent disappointments.


Flamingo Going Places (A.R. Barton) Short question answers

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

Going Places  

(A.R. Barton)

Short question answers

Question 1) Where was it most likely that the two girls would find work after school?

Answer: Sophie and Jansie would shortly graduate from their school. Only a few months remained. Jansie was well aware that both of them were headed for the biscuit factory. Sophie had big aspirations for her career. Jansie was a realist. She was aware that shop job was low-paying, and Sophie's father would not let her work there.

Question 2) What were the options that Sophie was dreaming of? Why does Jansie discourage her from having such dreams?

Answer: Sophie wants to create a boutique. It would be the most incredible shop the city had ever witnessed. Alternatively, she could become an actress and operate the store as a side business. She also considered being a fashion designer. Jansie had her feet planted firmly on the earth. She wanted Sophie to be sensible and forego all of her utopian aspirations, which all required a lot of money and experience.

Question 3) Why did Sophie wriggle when Geoff told her father that she had met Danny Casey?

Answer: Sophie had a close relationship with her father. He would be furious if he learned about her meeting with Danny Casey, a young Irish footballer. She did not inform him. When Geoff told his father about it, he became furious. He turned Ms' head and looked at her with disgust. Sophie wriggled in her seat at the table.

Question 4 )Does Geoff believe what Sophie says about her meeting with Danny Casey?
Answer: No, Geoff does not accept Sophie's claims regarding her meeting with Danny Casey. First, he looks about in surprise and says, "It can't be true". Again, he responds, "I don't believe it." Sophie then describes how Danny Casey approached and stood by her. Geoff asks her, "What does he look like?" So he doesn't appear to be convinced Sophie met Danny Casey.

Question 5) Does her father believe her story?

Answer: Sophie's father doesn't trust her story. When Geoff informed him that Sophie had met Danny Casey, his father looked at SopMe with contempt. He ignores her completely. He believes it is yet another 'crazy narrative'. He continues to discuss Tom Finny, another famous football player.

Question 6) Why didn’t Sophie want Jansie to know about her story with Danny?

Answer: Jansie was intensely interested in topics that did not involve her. She was curious about other people's affairs. She would spread the word across the neighborhood. Sophie didn't want Jansie to know about her experience with Danny. It could also be mutual competitiveness and one-upsmanship on her part. Sophie was surprised to find that Geoff had told Jansie about her experience with Danny.

Question 7) Did Sophie really meet Danny Casey? [Delhi 2014]
Answer: Sophie did not actually meet Danny Casey. She was attracted by the young Irish footballer. She imagined he was arriving. She waited in the park, waiting for Casey but knowing he would not arrive. She felt sad. Sadness was a difficult burden to bear. She was always lost in a fantasy realm, where she envisioned Casey meeting her.

Question 8) Which was the only occasion when she got to see Danny Casey in person?

Answer: Sophie only saw Danny Casey in person once, when the family went to watch United on Saturday. Sophie, her father, and Derek tumbled down near the goal. Geoff went with his friends higher up. United won two-nil. Her idol, Casey, drove in the second goal. She witnessed the Irish genius get past two large players on the brink of the penalty area. He defeated the cautious goalkeeper from 12 yards out. Sophie flushed with pride. She was quite happy.

Question 9) What are the other dreams of Sophie in addition to having a boutique?

Answer: Sophie's greatest desire is to own a store. She aspires to be more sophisticated and rise beyond her lower-middle-class background. Her other ambition is to become an actress since "there's real money in that". Moreover, actresses do not work full-time. She may manage her first love, the boutique, as a side business. She's got another alternative. She could become a fashion designer and do something smart.

Question 10) What job is Geoff engaged in? How does he differ from his sister, Sophie?

Answer: Geoff is a mature boy. He left school three years ago. He is currently an apprentice mechanic. Every day, he needs to travel to the other side of the city for business. He says little but listens to his sister's 'crazy stories'. But he's not a daydreamer like her. He understands his family's financial difficulties. He advises Sophie not to fantasize about a celebrity like Danny Casey.

Question 11) How does Sophie’s father react when Geoff tells him about her meeting with Danny Casey?

Answer: Geoff informs his father that Sophie has had a meeting with Danny Casey. He tilts his head on his thick neck, staring at her in bewilderment. His face is one of disgust. He ignores the news and goes on to discuss Tom Finney. He hopes Danny will come to like Tom Finney one day. Sophie tells Casey that he is planning to buy a shop, and he responds sharply. "This is another of your wild stories."

Question 12) Why was the visit of Sophie’s father and his family to watch United ‘their weekly pilgrimage’ ?

Answer: Sophie's father was an avid footfall fan. He was particularly interested in the career of Danny Casey, the Irish prodigy. Geoff, too, was interested in football. Sophie saw Danny Casey as her personal hero. She was continuously dreaming about him. Casey played for United. The family made regular visits to the stadium to watch him. So the family's visit resembled a religious or holy weekly ritual—a pilgrimage.

Question 13) Where did Sophie meet Casey and what transpired between them?

Answer: Sophie met Danny Casey at the arcade. She spoke first, asking whether he was Casey. He seemed astonished. He was definitely Danny Casey because he had an Irish accent. She had already heard him on TV. She requested him to sign an autograph for little Derek. However, neither of them had any paper or pens. Before leaving, he promised to sign his autograph if she wanted to meet him next week.

Question 14) What did Sophie want to keep a secret from her father and why? How did Jansie react to this disclosure?

Answer: Sophie informed Jansie that she wanted to keep her encounter with Casey a secret. If her father found out, there would be a fight. Jansie believed he would be happy. Sophie informed Jansie how miserable her father was. Furthermore, she didn't want a swarm of people questioning him about Danny Casey and her. She worried he would kill her. Her mother became agitated anytime there was a fight. Jansie reassured Sophie that she could trust her to maintain the secret.

Question 15) Why did Sophie choose to walk by the canal? What did she do there?

Answer: Sophie took a sheltered path alongside the canal. It was far from the loud and crowds of the metropolis. She had often played there as a child. There was a wooden bench under a single elm tree. Sometimes lovers would come there. That was the best place for her to dream about her hero, Danny Casey.

Flamingo The Interview Long question answers

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

The Interview  

(Christopher Silvester)

Long question answers

 


Question 1) Why do you think Christopher Silvester describes the viewpoints of other writers and authors when discussing the concept of an interview? Support your opinion with reference to any one writer cited.

Answer. The term 'interview' originates from the French word "entrevue." It represents a dialogue between a journalist or broadcaster and a figure of public interest. It serves as an oral assessment, commonly used in job applications, involving structured questioning. However, its scope extends beyond mere conversation, encompassing screening, interaction, and self-reflection. In this process, both the interviewer and interviewee engage, with the interviewee often facing the daunting scrutiny of the interviewer.

The term 'interview' was introduced 130 years ago, marking its integration into the fabric of journalism. In contemporary society, interviews have become ubiquitous, a requisite experience for individuals across various domains. Daily, thousands undergo interviews for diverse purposes. The perception of interviews varies: some regard it as a conduit of truth in its highest form, while others view it as an art form in practice. H.G. Wells initially disdained the 'interview,' referring to it as an ordeal in 1894. However, forty years later, he found himself interviewing Joseph Stalin of Russia, showcasing a shift in perspective. It's commonly perceived that much of the information reaching us stems from the interviewer, who wields considerable power and influence in this process.

Question 2)  Mukund Padmanabhan was a reporter from ‘The Hindu’. In the context of the chapter, reveal his traits as an interviewer.
OR
How would you evaluate Mukund Padmanabhan as an interviewer? Mention at least two qualities he displays in his interview, supported by textual evidence.

Answer. Mukund Padmanabhan epitomized a successful and thoughtful reporter known for posing articulate and skillful questions to his interviewees. He meticulously strategized and readied himself before conducting interviews with celebrities, ensuring that his inquiries were never crude or discomforting. Remarkably, the celebrities he interviewed appeared at ease with his line of questioning. Beyond merely extracting information about the celebrities, these interviews offered readers insights into various facets of Mukund's own character.

He approached his interviewees with concise and high-quality questions, demonstrating a meticulous approach. Mukund allowed interviewees the freedom to express themselves authentically, refraining from interruptions or aggressive probing. Consequently, his interview subjects felt at liberty to be candid and open with him.

Mukund consistently exhibited preparedness, meticulously arranging information and profiling the personalities of his interviewees in advance. With thorough groundwork, he commenced his sessions fully equipped and organized. Overall, Mukund Padmanabhan exemplified a disciplined and devoted interviewer.

Question 3)  Several celebrities despise being interviewed. Is this justified? Why? Why not? (CBSE 2010)

Answer. In this chapter, various celebrities such as Rudyard Kipling, VS Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow, and others express strong aversion towards interviews. They consistently declined to participate, viewing interviews as an intrusive invasion into their private lives. Protecting the secrecy of their personal affairs remained a priority for them.

For some, interviews were seen not just as an unwanted intrusion but also as an unethical act or even likened to a crime or assault. These individuals believed that interviewers consumed their valuable time, time that could be better utilized for fostering creativity. Contrarily, the general public perceives interviews positively as they provide insights into the inner workings and concealed aspects of their revered figures. However, interviews are not without their drawbacks.

Celebrities often feel apprehensive and disheartened when approached for interviews, disregarding the fact that their fame and wealth often stem from successful interview engagements. Their admirers and followers expand as the general public gains more insight into their idols' lives. Indeed, some celebrities even attain a revered status. From this perspective, it can be argued that labeling interviews as inherently immoral might not hold true.

Question 4)  Give a character sketch of Umberto Eco on the basis of the chapter ‘The Interview’.
OR
What impression do you form about Umberto Eco as a scholar and writer on the basis of ‘The Interview’? (CBSE 2010)

Answer. Umberto Eco, a renowned professor at the University of Bologna in Italy, boasts a dual identity as both an academic and a celebrated novelist. Across numerous interviews, he divulges the keys to his life's success and maintains a positive rapport with interviewers. His writing prowess spans various genres, encompassing academic texts, fiction, nonfiction, literary essays, children’s literature, and newspaper articles.

Preferring the title of an academician over that of a novelist, Eco actively engaged in academic conferences while consciously avoiding writer gatherings and memberships like the Pen Club. His impressive repertoire comprises forty scholarly works and five novels, a creative endeavor he exclusively reserved for Sundays. He unearthed a remarkable method of productivity within the interstices of time.

Utilizing every fleeting moment, Eco capitalized on even the briefest seconds, employing these gaps for jotting down notes or drafting content. Proficient in Semiotics, the study of signs, he never succumbed to arrogance, openly acknowledging the accidental success of his novel 'The Name of the Rose,' attributing its triumph to favorable timing. Despite its readership surpassing 10 million, Eco never adopted a celebrity demeanor.

Flamingo The Interview ( Short question answer)

 NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

The Interview  

(Christopher Silvester)

Short question answers

 

Question 1) How does Eco find the time to write so much?

Answer. Eco is a university lecturer who spends his week attending intellectual conferences. He finds so much time to write in the empty spaces in our life, just like the structure of atoms and the Universe does. These vacant areas are referred to as 'interstices' by him. He would rather compose an essay than remain idle while waiting for someone to come to his residence via the escalator. As a result, he regards himself as an academic who writes books on Sundays.

Question 2)  What was distinctive about Eco’s academic writing style?

Answer. Academic scholars typically write erroneous hypotheses, correct them, and then draw conclusions. Umberto, on the other hand, takes the readers on a tour through his research, referencing all of the tries and errors along the way. His narrative writing approach set him apart.

Question 3) . Did Umberto Eco consider himself a novelist first or an academic scholar?

Answer. Umberto Eco identifies as a member of the academic community. He describes himself as a university professor who attends intellectual conferences during the week and writes novels on Sundays.

Question 4) What is the reason for the huge success of the novel, The Name of the Rose?

Answer.The novel The Name of the Rose is difficult to read, which sets it apart from other novels. It's a detective novel with elements of metaphysics, religion, and medieval history. As a result, it addressed an audience that is not always interested in an easy reading experience. However, the novel's success remains a mystery. Umberto believes that if the work had been published ten years earlier or later, it would not have drawn the same proportion of the audience.

 Question 5)  How can we say that Umberto Eco had a wide range of writing?

Answer.Umberto Eco specialized in semiotics and began writing fiction, literary fiction, academic texts, essays, children's books, newspaper articles, and so on. As a result, his writing flexibility is clearly appreciated.

Question 6)  What is Umberto Eco’s theory of interstices?

Answer. Umberto Eco claims that removing the empty spaces from the universe would result in a universe the size of his fist. He emphasizes the significance of time's empty spaces.

Question 7) Umberto Eco does many things, but says, ‘I am always doing the same thing but that is more difficult to explain.’ What does he mean to say?

Answer. Umberto Eco claims to have philosophical interests that are reflected in all of his publications, both fiction and nonfiction. In this way, he performs the same thing, albeit he appears to engage in a variety of activities, such as writing notes for newspapers, teaching novels, writing essays, children's books, and so on.

Question 8)  Despite the drawbacks, the interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication. Explain.

Answer.Though an interview involves an intrusion into the interviewee's personal life, it is always a highly effective medium of communication. Only through interviews do we receive a clear picture of today's celebs. We get a glimpse of their working style, as well as their personal life and experiences.

Question 9)  Why do most celebrity writers despise being interviewed? (CBSE 2003, 2005, 2010)

Answer.  Most celebrity writers detest being interviewed because they have experienced interview anxiety. The interview is seen as an intrusion into their privacy by many of them.

Question 10) What do you understand by the expression “thumbprints on his windpipe”?

Answer. Thumbprints on his windpipe represent a barrier to anyone's freedom and privacy. It is possible that the interviewees felt suffocated.

Question 11)  Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give reasons for your opinion.

Answer. Umberto Eco clearly enjoys being interviewed, as evidenced by the excerpt from his interview included in this chapter. He answers all of Mukund's questions and never irritates or criticizes the interview, as many other celebrity writers do

Class 12 English Flamingo Poets and Pancakes (Long question answers)

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

Poets and Pancakes 

(Asokamitran)

Long question answers

Question 1)  Why is Subbu described as a many-sided genius? Give a reasoned answer. (2013 Comptt. Outside Delhi)


Answer
The author portrays Kothamangalam Subbu as a representation of individuals known as 'go-getters', who lack genuine talent but manage to create an illusion of talent around themselves. Despite being officially associated with the Story Department at Gemini Studios, Subbu is always by his boss's side. He dedicates all his energy and creativity to benefit his boss. Subbu successfully explores various aspects of filmmaking, presenting himself as an exceptional storyteller, a skilled actor, and a problem-solver. He effortlessly makes filmmaking seem effortless for his boss. Thus, Subbu's cunning nature allows him to exploit his boss's naivety and present himself as a multi-talented genius.

Question 2) Asokamitran has used humour and satire effectively in ‘Poets and Pancakes’. Discuss. (2001 Delhi)
Or
How does humour and satire enliven the account of the events and personalities at Gemini Studios as portrayed by Asokamitran in ‘Poets and Pancakes’? (2013 Outside Delhi)

Answer: In the chapter titled 'Poets and Pancakes', Asokamitran skillfully employs subtle humor and satire to shed light on human weaknesses. He cleverly portrays petty professional and inconsequential differences that not only occupy our minds but also elicit spontaneous and meaningful humor. The depiction of characters like the office boy Subbu and the legal advisor is laced with subtle touches of wit. Asokamitran's conversational writing style seamlessly transitions from one thought to another, allowing him to poke fun at the excessive makeup worn by artists, which can transform them into comically hideous figures. These humorous references evoke laughter. The perplexing purpose behind the visits of the Moral Rearmament Army and the English poet also adds to the satirical tone of the chapter. Furthermore, Asokamitran's satire extends to those who vehemently oppose communism, showcasing their extreme measures to combat it. Remarkably, the author's tone of ridicule remains devoid of any trace of mockery, which is truly commendable.

Question 3) Subbu was ‘tailor-made for films’. How did he use his genius in various activities in the Gemini Studios? (2008 Outside Delhi)

Answer The author presents Subbu as a remarkably skilled individual with a wide range of abilities in the realm of film-making. Subbu possesses expertise in various aspects, including story-writing, poetry, and character development, making him perfectly suited for the world of cinema. With Subbu's profound understanding of the intricacies and technicalities of film-making, the process appears effortless. During the golden years of Gemini Studios, Subbu played a pivotal role in revolutionizing and redefining its direction. He wholeheartedly dedicated his energy and creativity to benefit his boss, Mr. Vasan. Whenever his boss expressed dissatisfaction with a scene, Subbu would provide numerous alternative solutions. His comprehensive understanding of the complexities of film-making allowed him to showcase his talent across multiple artistic domains.

Question 4).
Why and how was the Moral Re-Armament Army welcomed at the Gemini Studios? (2008 Outside Delhi)

Answer: In 1952, Frank Buchman's Moral Re-Armament Army, consisting of two hundred individuals from twenty different nationalities, made a visit to Madras. The MRA was perceived as a counter-movement against international communism, which was not held in high regard by the people at Gemini Studios. However, Mr. Vasan, the boss of Gemini Studios, was captivated by the MRA, making the studio an ideal and welcoming host in India. During their visit, the MRA presented two plays, namely 'Jotham Valley' and 'The Forgotten Factor', with utmost professionalism. These plays, while conveying simple messages, boasted exceptional sets and costumes that left a lasting impression on both the Tamil drama community and Gemini Studios. The striking sunrise and sunset scenes from 'Jotham Valley' even served as inspiration for future productions in the years to come.

Question 5) ‘Subbu was a troubleshooter.’ Do you agree with this statement? Give an account of Subbu’s qualities of head and heart. (2012 Outside Delhi)

Answer: Subbu, a cunning and self-serving individual, skillfully ingratiated himself with his boss, eventually rising to the second position at Gemini Studios. Despite lacking talent and deserving the position, he manipulated his boss's gullibility and presented himself as competent and capable. Remarkably, Subbu maintained a cheerful disposition and remained resilient, unaffected by any setbacks. He possessed the ability to speak positively about others, always finding something good to say. With Subbu's presence, film-making seemed effortless, benefiting his boss as he devoted all his energy and creativity to his advantage. Additionally, Subbu displayed remarkable talent as a poet and actor. He penned original poems that resonated with the masses and excelled in secondary roles, outshining the main actors. However, his sycophantic behavior toward his boss earned him enemies and angered those who believed they were more deserving of success.

Question 6) What political significance does Gemini Studios’ invitation to Moral Re-Armament army and Stephen Spender show? (2012 Outside Delhi)


Answer:
The Moral Re-Armament army served as a counter movement to Communism, and the individuals at Gemini Studios harbored a natural aversion towards Communists and their ideology. They believed that Communists aimed to provoke unrest and violence. Therefore, by warmly hosting the Moral Re-Armament army, the people at Gemini Studios effectively expressed their opposition to Communist ideas. Inviting Stephen Spender, a renowned English poet who had once been attracted to Communism but later became disillusioned, was another way for Gemini Studios to emphasize their stance. This served to reinforce their aversion to Communism and allowed them to publicly demonstrate their disapproval.

Class 12 English Flamingo Poets and Pancakes (Short question answers)

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

Poets and Pancakes 

(Asokamitran)

Short question answers

 

1. What does the writer mean by ‘the fiery misery’ of those subjected to make-up’?

Answer. The writer is attempting to shed light on the problems performers and actresses suffer as a result of half a dozen mirrors surrounded by big light bulbs by referring to 'the flaming misery' of those subjected to make-up. The lights produced a lot of heat and were definitely not pleasant to look at.

2. What is the example of national integration that the author refers to?

Answer. A Bengali was the head of the make-up studio at first, but he outgrew Gemini Studios and moved on to larger chances. Following him was a Maharashtrian, who was helped by a Dharwar Kannadiga, an Andhra, a Madras Indian Christian, an Anglo-Burmese, and the usual local Tamils. The fact that people from all cultures collaborated promotes the post-independence national integration scenario. It demonstrates that people were unified even before All India Radio and Doordarshan brought up the idea.

3. What work did the ‘office boy’ do in the Gemini Studios? Why did he join the studios? Why was he disappointed?

Answer. The 'office kid' was in charge of slapping paint on the faces of players during crowd shooting. He came to Gemini Studios with the goal of becoming a top-tier actor, screenwriter, or producer.

4. Why did the author appear to be doing nothing at the studios?

Answer. The author’s job was to cut and collect newspaper clippings or sometimes even writing them by hand. This was easier and lesser in comparison to what others were doing at the Studio.

5. Why was the office boy frustrated? Who did he show his anger on?

Answer. The office lad was dissatisfied because he believed his literary gift would be squandered in a room full of barbers and make-up artists. He was able to direct his rage toward Subbu.

6. Subbu is described as a many-sided genius. List four of his special abilities.

Answer. Subbu, a guy of many talents, could always appear cheery, was an exceptional actor who could play his roles in a variety of ways, was an adept poet, and adored everyone he encountered.

7. Why was the legal adviser referred to as the opposite by others?

Answer Others referred to the legal adviser as the polar opposite since he once blackmailed an actress by taping her while she was having tantrums on work. This is not legal, so he was frequently referred to as the reverse.

8. Why was the Moral Rearmament Army welcomed at the Studios?

Answer. Frank Buchman's Moral Re-Armament brigade was warmly welcomed in the studio, owing to their political affiliation. The MRA was a pleasant distraction from their routine days at the studio.

9. Why is the Englishman’s visit referred to as an unexplained mystery?

Answer. The Englishman's visit to the Gemini Studios is described as an inexplicable mystery because no one could determine if he was a poet or an editor. Furthermore, no one in the studio understood what he was saying because his accent was beyond their comprehension.

10. Who was the English visitor to the studios?

Answer. Stephen Spender

11. Why was Kothamangalam Subbu considered No. 2 in Gemini Studios?

Answer. By using flattery, Kothamangalam Subbu was able to secure the position closest to The Boss. He wasn't clever, but he was happy and devoted to The Boss. When The Boss was in a jam, he gave solutions. As a result, the staff ranked him second in Gemini Studios.

Class 12 English Flamingo Indigo( Long answers)

 

NCERT Solutions For Class 12 English

Flamingo

Indigo

(Louis Fischer)

Long question answers

 

Q1. What solution to the problems of the poor did Gandhi suggest? How far did the Champaran movement help in this direction?
Ans. Sharecropper peasants were mandated to cultivate indigo on 15 percent of their land and hand over the indigo yield as rent to their landlords. However, when Germany introduced synthetic indigo, British landowners illicitly demanded money from the peasants to annul the 15 percent agreement. The peasants were coerced into signing new contracts and paying fees under the dominance of the landowners, who acted above the law. Many sought legal representation, incurring substantial expenses, and resorted to courts for justice.

 

Lawyers from Muzaffarpur informed Gandhi about these peasants, whom they frequently represented in court. Recognizing the severe oppression and fear these peasants faced, Gandhi prioritized liberating them from fear over legal justice. He was willing to face arrest on their behalf. Thousands of peasants spontaneously protested around the courthouse. Consequently, the government had to release Gandhi without bail. This voluntary uprising among the peasants marked the onset of their emancipation from British intimidation.

Q2. ‘Civil disobedience had triumphed, the first time in modern India.’Relate the events during Gandhi’s stay in Champaran that led to the triumph.
Ans. Gandhi had arrived in Motihari, the Champaran capital, to investigate the issues facing sharecropper peasants. While en route to a nearby village where a peasant suffered mistreatment, he encountered a roadblock orchestrated by the police superintendent’s messenger, commanding him to return to town. Upon reaching home, an official notice demanded Gandhi's immediate departure from Champaran. Defying the order, Gandhi inscribed his refusal on the receipt, resulting in a summons to appear in court the following day.

The subsequent morning, Motihari was teeming with peasants, their presence overwhelming. Thousands voluntarily demonstrated outside the court. Despite the prosecutor's plea for a trial postponement, Gandhi opposed the delay and admitted guilt by reading a statement. Inquiring about the penalty, the judge declared intent to pronounce the sentence post a two-hour recess, requesting bail for that duration. Gandhi, however, declined to furnish bail. Astonishingly, the judge released him without it. Later, after the recess, the judge announced a deferred judgment delivery, allowing Gandhi to remain free in the interim.

Days passed before Gandhi received a letter revealing the dismissal of the case against him. This event marked the triumph of civil disobedience, a historic first in India.

Q3. How did Gandhi work for rural uplift during his stay in Champarant
Ans. Gandhi aimed to tackle the cultural and social backwardness prevalent in Champaran's villages. His call for educators resulted in two of his young disciples, Mahadev Desai and Narhari Parikh, along with their spouses, offering themselves for this initiative. Additionally, several others from different parts of the country responded. Kasturba Gandhi and Devdas, Gandhi’s youngest son, arrived from the Ashram to support the cause. They established primary schools in six villages. Kasturba emphasized the Ashram’s rules on personal and community cleanliness, engaging with women to address the issue of unclean garments.

The health situation was dire, prompting Gandhi to arrange for a doctor to volunteer for six months. With only three medicines at their disposal—castor oil, quinine, and sulphur ointment—specific treatments were provided based on symptoms. A coated tongue warranted a dose of castor oil, while malaria patients received quinine along with castor oil. Skin eruptions were treated with ointment accompanied by castor oil.

Gandhi's approach went beyond political or economic solutions; he dedicated himself to uplifting villages and marginalized sections of society in their entirety.

Q4. Why is the Champaran episode considered to be the beginning of the Indian struggle for Independence? [All India 2014]
Ans. The Champaran episode initiated as an endeavor to alleviate the hardships of numerous peasants, garnering spontaneous support from thousands. Gandhi asserted that the British had no authority to dictate terms in his homeland. With his leadership, the peasants gained awareness of their rights. Raj Kumar Shukla, a Champaran farmer, played a significant role in facilitating this change. Additionally, other courageous peasants contributed in various ways to the movement, culminating in their victory in the battle of Champaran.