My School

Example of debate writing (9)

The government has banned the use of animals in the laboratories for the purpose of dissection. Write a debate in 150-200 words\either for or against this decision. (All India 2015)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

The government’s decision to ban the use of animals in laboratories for dissection is a positive step forward. This ban reflects growing concern for animal welfare. It is important to treat all living beings with respect.

First, animals have the right to live free from harm. Dissection often causes pain and suffering. By banning this practice, we protect animals from unnecessary cruelty.

Second, there are many alternatives to animal dissection. Technology has advanced significantly. Students can now use virtual simulations and models to learn anatomy. These methods can be just as effective, if not more so.

Moreover, this ban encourages ethical education. It teaches students the importance of compassion and respect for life. Understanding ethics is crucial for future scientists and medical professionals.

Additionally, dissection may not be the best way to learn. Many studies show that hands-on methods using models can enhance understanding without harming animals.

In conclusion, banning animal dissection is a humane decision. It protects animals, promotes ethical learning, and encourages the use of modern alternatives. This is a step towards a more compassionate and responsible society.

Thank you!

Against:-

The government’s ban on using animals in laboratories for dissection is a misguided decision. While animal welfare is important, this ban can hinder education and scientific progress.

First, dissection provides valuable hands-on experience. For many students, working with real specimens is essential to understanding complex biological concepts. Virtual simulations cannot fully replicate this experience.

Second, dissection is a crucial part of medical and veterinary training. Future doctors and veterinarians need to learn anatomy through real-life examples. This practice helps them develop important skills for their careers.

Moreover, banning dissection may limit research opportunities. Many medical breakthroughs have come from studies involving animal anatomy. Removing this option could slow down scientific advancements.

Additionally, ethical guidelines can ensure humane treatment of animals during dissection. Many institutions already follow strict protocols to minimize suffering. A ban is not necessary when better practices can be implemented.

In conclusion, the government’s ban on animal dissection is not the right solution. It undermines education, hinders research, and limits essential training. Instead of banning, we should focus on improving ethical practices in laboratories.

Thank you!

Example of debate writing (8)

‘Our large population is not a cause of poverty but an asset, a resource.’ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion. (Delhi 2017)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

The idea that "our large population is not a cause of poverty but an asset, a resource" highlights the potential of human capital. A large population can drive economic growth and development.

First, a big population means a larger workforce. More workers can increase productivity. This can lead to higher output in various sectors, from agriculture to technology.

Second, a diverse population brings different skills and ideas. This diversity fosters innovation. When people from different backgrounds come together, they can create new solutions and products.

Moreover, a large population can attract investment. Businesses often look for areas with a sizable market. A bigger population can mean more consumers, which can encourage companies to invest and create jobs.

Additionally, a youthful population can be a great advantage. Young people bring energy and creativity. They can adapt to new technologies and drive progress.

In conclusion, a large population can be seen as a valuable resource. It can boost the economy, promote innovation, and attract investment. By investing in education and training, we can harness this potential and turn it into prosperity.

Thank you!

Against:-

The statement "our large population is not a cause of poverty but an asset, a resource" is misleading. A large population can actually contribute to poverty in several ways.

First, overpopulation can strain resources. When too many people compete for limited resources like food, water, and land, it can lead to shortages. This increases the cost of living and makes it harder for families to meet their basic needs.

Second, a large population can lead to high unemployment. If there are not enough jobs for everyone, many people will struggle to find work. This can result in increased poverty and social unrest.

Moreover, inadequate infrastructure can become a major issue. Schools, hospitals, and roads may not keep up with the growing population. This can affect education and healthcare, leading to a less skilled workforce.

Additionally, overpopulation can create environmental problems. More people mean more waste and pollution. This can harm the environment and reduce quality of life.

In conclusion, while a large population has potential benefits, it often leads to significant challenges. Without proper management and resources, it can be a major cause of poverty.

Thank you!

Example of debate writing (7)

Write a debate either for or against the motion: ‘Participation in sports is a mere wastage of time’. (150-200 avoids).

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

The idea that "participation in sports is a mere wastage of time" emphasizes how time could be better spent. While sports can be enjoyable, they often take away valuable time from studies and other important activities.

First, time spent on sports can distract from academics. Students have to balance schoolwork and sports. Many struggle to keep up with their studies while dedicating hours to training or games. This can lead to lower grades and missed learning opportunities.

Second, sports can encourage unhealthy competition. Some individuals become too focused on winning. This can create stress and anxiety. Instead of fostering teamwork, it may lead to negative experiences.

Moreover, sports require financial investment. Families spend money on equipment, uniforms, and travel. This can be a burden for some, diverting funds from essential needs.

Finally, not everyone excels in sports. Many students may feel discouraged or left out if they do not perform well. This can harm self-esteem and motivation.

In conclusion, while sports have their benefits, participation can often be a waste of time. Focusing on academics and personal development is a more productive use of time.

Thank you!

Against:-

The statement "participation in sports is a mere wastage of time" overlooks the many benefits of sports. Engaging in sports is not just about playing games; it offers valuable life skills and experiences.

First, sports promote physical health. Regular physical activity helps maintain a healthy weight, improves fitness, and reduces the risk of diseases. Staying active is crucial for overall well-being.

Second, sports teach important life skills. Teamwork, discipline, and leadership are all learned through participation. Athletes learn to work with others and develop a strong work ethic. These skills are useful in both personal and professional life.

Moreover, sports provide an outlet for stress. Participating in sports can improve mental health. It allows individuals to release tension and feel more relaxed. This can lead to better focus in studies and work.

Additionally, sports foster a sense of community. Being part of a team creates friendships and connections. This support system can enhance social skills and build confidence.

In conclusion, participation in sports is not a waste of time. It offers numerous physical, mental, and social benefits. Engaging in sports can enrich lives and contribute to personal growth.

Thank you!

Example of debate writing (6)

Write a debate either for or against the motion: Laziness and not bad luck is the only obstacle in one’s success in life.(Comptt. Delhi 2017)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

The statement "laziness and not bad luck is the only obstacle in one’s success in life" emphasizes personal responsibility. While some may blame bad luck, laziness often holds people back from achieving their goals.

First, laziness prevents action. People who are lazy do not put in the effort needed to succeed. They procrastinate and miss opportunities. This leads to a cycle of failure.

Second, success requires hard work and dedication. Many successful individuals face challenges. However, they overcome them through consistent effort. Laziness stops people from pushing through difficulties.

Moreover, blaming bad luck can be a way to avoid accountability. It is easy to say that circumstances are against us. In reality, many people have succeeded despite tough situations. They did not let laziness stop them.

Additionally, success often comes from setting goals and working towards them. Lazy individuals may lack motivation and direction. This can result in missed chances and wasted potential.

In conclusion, laziness is a major obstacle to success. While bad luck can happen, it is our effort that truly matters. By overcoming laziness, anyone can find their path to success.

Thank you!

Against:-

The statement "laziness and not bad luck is the only obstacle in one’s success in life" is too simple. While laziness can hinder success, bad luck plays a significant role in many people's lives.

First, not everyone has the same opportunities. Some face difficult situations beyond their control. Economic challenges, health issues, and family problems can create obstacles that hard work alone cannot overcome.

Second, bad luck can affect decisions and chances. For example, a talented person may apply for a job but not get it due to random circumstances. This has nothing to do with laziness. It is simply bad luck.

Moreover, success often requires support from others. Not everyone has access to mentors or networks that help them succeed. Lack of support can be a bigger barrier than laziness.

Finally, many hardworking individuals still struggle to achieve their goals. They put in effort but face setbacks. This shows that hard work alone is not always enough.

In conclusion, while laziness can be an obstacle, bad luck is also a real factor in success. Life is complex, and many elements contribute to achieving goals.

Thank you!

Example of debate writing (5)

Write a debate either for or against the motion: Hard work, not Intelligence paves the way to success in life. (Comptt. All 2017)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

The saying "hard work, not intelligence, paves the way to success" highlights the importance of effort in achieving goals. While intelligence is valuable, it is hard work that truly makes a difference.

First, hard work builds skills and experience. People who put in the effort learn more. They become better at their jobs and improve their abilities over time. This leads to success.

Second, hard work shows dedication. Employers value commitment. A person who works hard is often seen as reliable and trustworthy. This can lead to promotions and new opportunities.

Moreover, hard work helps overcome challenges. Life is full of obstacles. Those who are willing to work hard can push through difficulties. They learn resilience and adaptability, which are crucial for success.

Finally, hard work inspires others. When people see someone working hard, they are motivated to do the same. This creates a positive environment that fosters growth.

In conclusion, hard work is the key to success. It builds skills, shows dedication, helps overcome challenges, and inspires others. Intelligence may help, but hard work makes the difference.

Thank you!

Against:-

The idea that "hard work, not intelligence, paves the way to success" overlooks the role of intelligence. While hard work is important, intelligence plays a crucial role in achieving goals.

First, intelligence allows people to solve problems more effectively. Smart individuals can think critically and make better decisions. This can lead to more successful outcomes without the same level of effort.

Second, not all hard work leads to success. Many people work hard but do not achieve their goals. Sometimes, they lack the knowledge or skills needed to succeed. Intelligence helps in choosing the right strategies and paths.

Moreover, innovation often comes from intelligent thinking. Many successful inventions and ideas arise from creative minds. Hard work alone cannot replace the need for original thought.

Finally, intelligence can help individuals work smarter, not just harder. This can lead to increased efficiency and better results in less time.

In conclusion, while hard work is valuable, intelligence is equally important. Both qualities together create the best chance for success in life. Relying solely on hard work ignores the benefits of intelligence.

Thank you!

Example of debate writing (4)

4. Consumerism is increasing day by day. Luxuries of yesterday have become necessities of today. The result is that the more we want the more miserable we become. Write a debate in 150-200 words on ‘The only way to minimise human suffering and pain is to control our needs’. You are Navtej/Navita. (All India 2015)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

Consumerism is increasing day by day. We all are materialistic to some extent.

I, Navita, have come before you all to speak for the motion ‘The only way to minimise human suffering and pain is to control our needs’.

Consumerism is becoming more widespread in today's world. What used to be considered a luxury is now seen as a necessity. Many believe that this growing desire for more is making people more unhappy, not more satisfied.

In favor of this argument, it is clear that as people acquire more, they always want more. New gadgets, fancy clothes, and bigger houses were once luxuries, but now they are viewed as must-haves. This endless cycle of wanting leads to dissatisfaction. The more we focus on material things, the less content we feel with what we have.

Moreover, consumerism creates unnecessary pressure to keep up with trends. People spend money on things they don’t truly need, just to fit in or feel successful. This leads to stress, debt, and a feeling of emptiness when material possessions fail to bring happiness.

Also, the pursuit of endless consumption takes time away from meaningful relationships and personal growth. People get trapped in working more just to buy more, losing focus on what truly matters in life.

In conclusion, the rise of consumerism is leading to more misery. The more we want, the less content we become, making true happiness harder to achieve.

Thank You!

Against:-

Consumerism is a growing trend in today’s society. Many believe that luxuries have turned into necessities, making people more miserable. However, there are strong arguments against this view.

First, consumerism drives innovation and improves quality of life. Companies strive to create better products, which leads to advancements in technology and comfort. Many items that were once considered luxuries, like smartphones and high-quality healthcare, have become essential for communication and well-being.

Second, consumerism can provide joy and satisfaction. Buying something new can make people feel happy. Celebrating milestones with gifts or experiences can enhance relationships and create lasting memories.

Moreover, consumerism allows for personal expression. People use their purchases to showcase their identity and values. This can foster creativity and individuality.

Lastly, it is important to recognize that happiness does not solely depend on material goods. Many find joy in experiences, relationships, and personal growth, regardless of their consumption habits.

In conclusion, while consumerism has its downsides, it also brings benefits. It fuels innovation, creates happiness, and allows for personal expression. Therefore, consumerism does not always lead to misery.

Thank You!

Example of debate writing (3)

3. ‘Private cars should be banned in the congested commercial areas of the cities/ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion. (Delhi 2017)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

Congested commercial areas in cities face heavy traffic, pollution, and noise. Many believe that banning private cars in these areas can help solve these problems. This idea has strong support for various reasons.

In favor of banning private cars, it can significantly reduce traffic jams. Commercial areas are crowded with shoppers, workers, and delivery vehicles. When private cars add to this, it causes severe congestion. Without private cars, the roads would be less crowded, allowing essential vehicles to move more easily.

Moreover, banning private cars can lower pollution levels. Fewer cars on the road means less air pollution, which is better for the environment and public health. It can also reduce noise pollution, making the area more pleasant for people.

Another benefit is improved public transport and walkability. When cars are restricted, cities can focus on developing better public transport and creating more pedestrian-friendly spaces. This makes it easier for everyone to get around without the need for private vehicles.

In conclusion, banning private cars in congested commercial areas can lead to less traffic, reduced pollution, and a more efficient and pleasant urban experience.

Thank You!

Against:-

Congested commercial areas in cities are often busy with traffic, people, and businesses. Some suggest banning private cars in these areas to reduce congestion. However, there are strong arguments against this idea.

Private cars provide convenience and flexibility. Many people rely on their cars to travel quickly and comfortably, especially for work or shopping. Banning cars would make it difficult for them to reach these areas easily. Public transport may not always be reliable or available for everyone.

Additionally, banning private cars could hurt local businesses. Many customers prefer to drive to commercial areas for shopping or dining. If cars are banned, businesses might lose customers who find it inconvenient to visit without their vehicles. This could harm the local economy.

Moreover, private cars are essential for people with special needs, elderly individuals, or those carrying heavy items. For them, public transport may not be a practical option.

In conclusion, while reducing traffic is important, banning private cars in congested areas could cause more inconvenience than benefits. It could harm businesses and limit the mobility of many people. A better solution would be improving traffic management and public transport without banning private cars altogether.

Thank You!

Example of debate writing (2)

2. ‘Rising prices can be controlled only by the government.’ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion. (Delhi 2016)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour :-

Rising prices are a major concern for any country. They affect the daily lives of people, especially the poor and middle class. Many believe that controlling rising prices can only be done by the government, as it has the power and resources to address the issue.

In favor of this argument, the government has the authority to regulate key economic factors. It can control inflation by adjusting interest rates and managing the money supply. Through these measures, it can stabilize the economy and bring prices down.

The government can also impose price controls on essential goods such as food, fuel, and medicines. By doing this, it ensures that these basic needs remain affordable for everyone, even during times of crisis.

Moreover, the government can take action against hoarding and black marketing. Strict laws and enforcement can prevent unethical practices that drive prices up.

Additionally, the government can provide subsidies to reduce the burden of rising prices on consumers. In conclusion, only the government has the authority and tools to manage the complex factors that cause prices to rise. Therefore, government intervention is crucial in controlling inflation and keeping prices in check.

Thank You!

Against:-

Rising prices are a serious issue that affects everyone. Many believe that only the government can control rising prices. However, this is not entirely true. Other factors, like market forces and public behavior, also play a big role in controlling prices.

In arguing against the idea, it's important to note that the government cannot control all aspects of the economy. Prices are often driven by supply and demand. When demand is higher than supply, prices rise. Businesses, farmers, and producers also need to take steps to increase production and improve supply. This helps keep prices stable.

Consumers also have a role. If people buy wisely and avoid panic buying, it can prevent unnecessary price hikes. Public awareness and responsible buying habits can help control prices as much as government policies.

Furthermore, global factors, such as oil prices or international trade, impact local prices. The government has limited control over these. Market competition can also lower prices. When businesses compete, they often reduce prices to attract customers.

In conclusion, rising prices are influenced by many factors beyond just government control. The combined efforts of producers, consumers, and market forces are equally important.

Thank You!

Example of debate writing (1)

1) ‘The policy of reservation of seats for admission to the professional courses is good for the deprived sections of society’. Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion. (Delhi 2016)
Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour:-

The policy of reserving seats for admission to professional courses is a way to ensure equal opportunities for the deprived sections of society. Many people from disadvantaged backgrounds have been historically marginalized and denied access to quality education. This reservation policy helps bridge that gap by giving them a fair chance to compete.

In favor of the policy, it is important to recognize that not everyone starts from the same level in society. Some groups have faced economic, social, and educational challenges for generations. Without reservations, they may struggle to gain access to prestigious courses that lead to better careers. The policy helps uplift these sections by providing them with opportunities that they might not otherwise have.

Moreover, reservation ensures diversity in educational institutions, allowing students from different backgrounds to learn together. This enriches the learning experience for everyone. It also helps build a more inclusive society where everyone has the chance to succeed, regardless of their background.

In conclusion, the reservation of seats for deprived sections is not just a policy of inclusion but one of justice, giving those who have been left behind the opportunity to advance in life.

Thank You!

Against:-

The policy of reserving seats for admission to professional courses is meant to help the deprived sections of society. However, there are strong arguments against it, as it may not always lead to the intended results and could create other problems.

One major issue with the reservation policy is that it can compromise merit. Professional courses require a high level of skill and knowledge, and admitting students based on reserved seats rather than merit may result in less qualified professionals. This could affect the quality of professionals in critical fields like medicine and engineering.

Additionally, reservation can create a sense of inequality among students. Those admitted through general seats may feel unfairly treated, which can lead to division and resentment. The policy can also encourage dependency rather than self-reliance, as students may come to rely on reservations instead of striving to compete on equal terms.

Lastly, reservations do not always reach the truly needy. Often, it benefits those who are already somewhat privileged within the deprived sections, leaving the most disadvantaged behind. Therefore, while the policy aims to help, it can sometimes lead to unintended negative consequences.

Thank You!

Debate Writing

1. What is Debate Writing?

Debate writing is the process of preparing arguments for a debate. It helps people express their views clearly and persuasively. In debate writing, you present your side of an issue and support it with facts. You also address opposing views. This helps strengthen your argument.

A typical debate piece has three main parts. First, there is an introduction. It states the topic and your position. Next, the main body presents your arguments. Each argument should be clear and backed by evidence. Finally, the conclusion summarizes your points and reinforces your stance.

Good debate writing requires practice. You need to think critically and anticipate counterarguments. Clarity is key. Use simple language and structure your ideas logically. This makes it easier for your audience to understand. Overall, debate writing is a valuable skill. It improves your ability to communicate and engage with important topics.

2. The Importance of Debate Writing?

Debate writing is a valuable skill. It helps people express their thoughts clearly. It also teaches them to think critically about different issues. The importance of debate writing lies in its ability to develop key skills.

First, debate writing enhances communication skills. It requires writers to present their ideas in a clear and persuasive way. This is important in many areas of life, from school to the workplace.

Second, it encourages research and analysis. Writers must gather facts and understand different viewpoints. This process builds knowledge and helps people become well-informed.

Third, debate writing fosters confidence. Writing and presenting arguments can boost self-esteem. It prepares individuals for speaking in public and defending their ideas.

Additionally, debate writing promotes open-mindedness. Writers learn to consider opposing views. This encourages respectful dialogue and understanding among people with different opinions.

In summary, debate writing is important because it improves communication, research skills, and confidence. It also fosters critical thinking and open-mindedness. These skills are essential for success in many aspects of life.

3. Format

a) Formal Address

b) Introduction: Against or For the motion

c) Arguments/ Logic ( main body)

d) Conclusion or final remark.

e) Thanks

4. Important points

Debate must include a Formal Address in the beginning and a Formal Thanks in the end.
Argument or logic given must be well organized and relevant to the topic. There should be creativity in presenting the ideas.
Logical accuracy, Grammatical accuracy, appropriate words & spelling, Fluency and relevance of ideas and style are utmost important.

5. Some Examples

Question 1.
Write a debate either for or against the motion: ‘Courses in Humanities provide a better scope in career than Sciences’. (Comptt. All India 2017)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

In favour of:

In today’s changing world, choosing the right field of study is crucial for future success. I believe that courses in the humanities offer better career opportunities than those in the sciences.

Humanities subjects, like psychology, history, and sociology, teach valuable skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and effective communication. These skills are highly sought after by employers in many industries, including marketing, education, and public relations.

Additionally, as the job market evolves, there is a growing need for adaptable professionals who can understand and solve social issues. While science careers can be rewarding, they are often more specialized and may limit job options. In contrast, a humanities education prepares students for a wide range of roles, making it easier to find fulfilling work in various fields. Overall, humanities courses provide a broader and more flexible career path.

Thank you!

You can also write against the given topic as given below.

While Humanities courses offer valuable insights into human culture, society, and critical thinking, arguing that they provide better career scope than Sciences overlooks several key factors. The world today is driven by technological advancements, scientific innovations, and the demand for specialized skills, all of which are heavily rooted in science-based education.

First, careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) are expanding rapidly, with high demand across industries like healthcare, IT, engineering, and environmental sciences. These fields offer not only a wider range of job opportunities but also higher salaries, job stability, and continuous growth prospects. In contrast, many careers in Humanities often face challenges like lower wages and fewer job openings.

Additionally, the versatility of science degrees allows individuals to branch into various sectors, including research, academia, industry, and government, making the scope broader and more dynamic. The global economy increasingly relies on scientific expertise to solve pressing issues like climate change, healthcare crises, and technological innovation.

While Humanities offer important skills in communication, critical thinking, and creativity, Science courses align more directly with the needs of modern economies and provide better long-term career prospects and growth opportunities.

Thank you!

Question 2.
Some people feel that electronic media (TV news) will bring about the end of print media (newspapers). What are your views on the issue? Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against this view. (All India 2015)

Answer: (In exam write any one of the following answers)

Against:

Some people believe that electronic media (TV news) will bring about the end of the print media (newspaper). I, XYZ, disagree with this view.

The rise of electronic media, especially TV news, has sparked discussions about the future of print media, particularly newspapers. While some argue that the convenience and immediacy of digital formats will render print obsolete, this perspective overlooks several crucial factors that highlight the enduring value of print.

Firstly, print newspapers offer a tactile experience and a sense of permanence that digital formats cannot replicate. Many readers appreciate the ritual of flipping through pages, which can enhance engagement and comprehension.

Moreover, print media provides in-depth analysis that often gets sidelined in fast-paced TV news segments. Newspapers allow for nuanced reporting, investigative journalism, and comprehensive storytelling, which are vital for an informed public.

Additionally, print media has a loyal audience, particularly among older demographics who may not be as comfortable with digital platforms. Even in the age of technology, many people value the reliability and credibility associated with established newspapers.

In conclusion, rather than signaling the end of print media, electronic platforms are more likely to coexist with it, catering to diverse preferences and ensuring that quality journalism continues to thrive in various formats.

Thank you!

You can also write in favour of as given below.

With the rise of electronic media, many people believe that traditional print media, like newspapers, might eventually disappear. TV news, online platforms, and mobile apps have become the primary sources of information for most people. This shift in how we consume news has sparked a debate about whether print media can survive in the digital age.

In favor of the argument that electronic media will lead to the end of print media, it's clear that technology and consumer habits are changing rapidly. TV news and online platforms offer instant access to information, making newspapers seem slow and less relevant. The convenience of electronic media allows people to access news anytime, anywhere, without waiting for the next day's paper.

Moreover, electronic media is more eco-friendly, reducing the need for paper and printing. Advertisers also prefer digital platforms because they offer targeted ads and better tracking. Lastly, the multimedia features of electronic news—such as live videos and interactive elements—provide a richer experience, especially for younger audiences. As technology advances, print media may gradually fade away, replaced by faster, more dynamic electronic news sources.

6. For more examples also see:-

1) ‘The policy of reservation of seats foradmission to the professional courses is good for the deprived sections of society’. Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.(Delhi 2016)

2) ‘Rising prices can be controlled only by thegovernment.’ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.(Delhi 2016)

3) ‘Private cars should be banned in the congestedcommercial areas of the cities/ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for oragainst the motion. (Delhi 2017)

4) Consumerism is increasing day by day. Luxuries of yesterday have become necessities of today. The result is that the more we want the more miserable we become. Write a debate in 150-200 words on ‘The only way to minimise human suffering and pain is to control our needs’. You are Navtej/Navita. (All India 2015)

5) Write a debate either for or against the motion: Hardwork, not Intelligence paves the way to success in life. (Comptt. All India 2017)

6) Write a debate either for or against the motion:Laziness and not bad luck is the only obstacle in one’s success inlife.(Comptt. Delhi 2017)

7) Write a debate either for or against the motion:‘Participation in sports is a mere wastage of time’. (150-200 avoids).

8) ‘Our large population is not a cause of poverty but anasset, a resource.’ Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against themotion. (Delhi 2017)

9) The government has banned the use of animals in thelaboratories for the purpose of dissection. Write a debate in 150-200words\either for or against this decision. (All India 2015)

10) Migration from villages to cities has led to thespread of urban slums. People living in these slums lead a miserable life.Economic disparity leads to the problems of law and order. Write a debate in150-200 words on ‘Solution to the problem of misery in the urban slums lies increating jobs in the villages’. You are Navtej/Navita. (All India 2015)

8. Here are 20 topics for debate writing practice.

You should practices in favour of and also

against each topic.: